jump to navigation

US Farm Subsidies Endanger Africa: New Campaign March 1, 2007

Posted by publicpolitics in Uncategorized.
trackback

US farm subsidies exist to protect American farmers from the low prices that competition brings, and they have been a political hot potato in US domestic  politics for many years. But in parts of Africa, U.S. farm support policies draw ire, dread, and outrage. Now a group of women parliamentarians has announced a massive publicity campaign to get the word out to American farmers and the voting public in general.

The first Women Parliamentarian’s International Conference, held in Kigali, featured a call  for the new campaign from Valentine Ruwabiza, the Deputy General of the WTO. She claims that while U.S. farmers constitute only 5%  of the population, they have the influence of a much larger constituency. Ruwabiza joins a host of NGOs in attributing widespread misery to the subsidies.

British Charity Oxfam, which used graphic illustrations of the suffering caused by the subsidies, pointed out, for example, that America’s cotton farmers receive subsidies amounting to more than the gross domestic product of Burkina Faso (BBC Profile) , where two million people depend on cotton production.

Source: nationmedia.com

The public relations campaign will start with targeting messages and outreach efforts to American farm groups, a strategy clearly in line with the idea that widespread ignorance of the ill effects of the funds is partly to blame for their yearly renewal. There is some evidence that this initial approach can change minds, according to this well-written piece by Katie  Danko:

Terry Steinhour and his wife Phyllis farm about 650 acres in
Springfield, Illinois, the heart of corn-producing country. The
Steinhours’ are well-respected in their central Illinois community, and
Terry is active with his church and the Illinois Farm Bureau. During
the last six months, Terry has also been involved and vocal about
reforming US farm policy. “It should address the needs of family
farmers, not industrial-sized farms,” he said

Source: nationmedia.com

Clearly, Mr. Steinhour makes a distinction between small farms and larger holdings. With strong advocates for change among family farmers, the US public will be better able to differentiate among the views of small farmers, which probably will have strong popular support, and agribusiness, equipped with armies of lobbyists and treasure chests of cash.

Tags: Subsidies | GOVERNMENTS | agribusiness | Western | Uganda | Politics | kigali | Europe | Burkina Faso | Africa

Advertisements

Comments»

No comments yet — be the first.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: